Head-to-head · Cardio Machines
Concept2 RowErg vs WalkingPad Z1 Foldable Walking Pad
Which should you buy in 2026? FR Scores, specs, prices and 9 independent video reviews, side by side.

The rower gyms and athletes trust, built to last for decades
Typical price · Standard legs (14-in seat) from Concept2; tall legs cost more

A slim walking pad that folds in half to hide in a closet or under a bed
Typical price · Grey Z1 at WalkingPad.com (list $329)
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links — it never affects our scores. How we make money
The quick verdict
Concept2 RowErg edges ahead with an FR Score of 9.4 vs 8.4, winning on build quality & durability, performance & feel and value for money. It’s our Best Overall, while Z1 Foldable Walking Pad is our Best for Small Spaces. Z1 Foldable Walking Pad is the cheaper pick by about $691.
Choose RowErg if…
- Smooth, responsive air resistance with an adjustable damper
- PM5 monitor delivers accurate, comparable data and connects via Bluetooth and ANT+
- 500 lb user capacity (as tested by Concept2)
Choose Z1 Foldable Walking Pad if…
- Folds in half to 31.8 x 22 x 5.4 in for storage
- Slim 4.1-in deck makes stepping on and off easy
- Quiet 2.25 HP brushless motor
Scores
Score breakdown
Each criterion scored 0–10 by our methodology. The winner of each row is highlighted.
Specs
Specs side by side
| Spec | RowErg | Z1 Foldable Walking Pad |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance | Air flywheel with adjustable damper | — |
| Monitor | PM5 (Bluetooth and ANT+; two D-cell batteries) | — |
| Max user weight | 500 lb (as tested by Concept2) | 242 lb |
| Footprint | 96 x 24 in (8 x 2 ft) | — |
| Seat height | 14 in (standard legs) or 20 in (tall legs) | — |
| Monorail length | 54 in (fits inseams up to 38 in) | — |
| Machine weight | 57 lb (standard legs) | — |
| Storage | Separates into two pieces; 25 x 33 x 54 in stored (standard legs) | — |
| Warranty | Limited 5-year frame / 2-year parts | 1 year (extension available) |
| Speed | — | 1-4 mph |
| Walking area | — | 47.6 x 15.7 in |
| Motor | — | 2.25 HP brushless |
| Net weight | — | 51 lb |
| Unfolded size | — | 56.1 x 22 x 4.1 in |
| Folded size | — | 31.8 x 22 x 5.4 in |
| Controls | — | Remote and app; LED display |
RowErg: pros & cons
- Smooth, responsive air resistance with an adjustable damper
- PM5 monitor delivers accurate, comparable data and connects via Bluetooth and ANT+
- 500 lb user capacity (as tested by Concept2)
- Separates into two pieces for storage, no tools required
- Famously durable and low-maintenance, with strong resale value
- Long footprint: about 8 x 2 ft, with 9 x 4 ft recommended in use
- Fan whoosh is louder than magnetic or water rowers
- No touchscreen or built-in classes
- Premium price near $1,000 before shipping
Z1 Foldable Walking Pad: pros & cons
- Folds in half to 31.8 x 22 x 5.4 in for storage
- Slim 4.1-in deck makes stepping on and off easy
- Quiet 2.25 HP brushless motor
- Long 47.6-in walking belt suits taller walkers
- No assembly: unfold, plug in and walk
- Walking only: 1-4 mph with no incline or handrail
- 242 lb capacity is lower than many rivals
- Pricier than generic walking pads
On video
What reviewers say
RowErg vs Z1 Foldable Walking Pad: FAQ
Is Concept2 RowErg better than WalkingPad Z1 Foldable Walking Pad?
Concept2 RowErg scores higher overall (9.4 vs 8.4 out of 10), winning on build quality & durability, performance & feel and value for money. Z1 Foldable Walking Pad still has the edge on ease of use & footprint.
Which is cheaper, RowErg or Z1 Foldable Walking Pad?
At typical prices, WalkingPad Z1 Foldable Walking Pad costs about $691 less ($990 vs $299). Sizes and deals vary, so check the current price at the retailer.
Which has more video reviews?
We’ve cataloged 5 independent video reviews of RowErg and 4 of Z1 Foldable Walking Pad. Both products’ pages list every review with the creator’s verdict.